My feedback for you, if you care for it, is to find a way to disprove your ideas in principle. What fact, if uncovered, what clearly show your ideas to be false? What counter-intuitive prediction could be used to test them?
Without that, all you appear to have is a set of ideas, a little too close to solipsism, in which explanations for anything can be generated in terms of mysterious forms of consciousness. Terren On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 11:22 AM 'Cosmin Visan' via Everything List < everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote: > You can still continue to make science as you are doing it today, in order > to increase the quality of life. The thing is that you never had causality, > determinism, prediction, and any hope of understanding the universe to > start with. What we gain is precisely this: the ability to understand > existence. You can still make predicitons, but they will be prediciton of > the kind: "If you put your hand into the fire, you will get burned. Don't > you believe me ? Try it!", namely predictions by way of experience. First > someone experiences something (without prediction what it will be, because > you cannot predict something that you never experienced), and then by > understanding the context that generated that specific meaning, you will > invite other consciousness to put themselves into that precise context. God > himself created the world in order to experience things. He couldn't have > imagined by his own will new qualia, because he didn't have the proper > contexts for those qualia to be brought into existence. So he forgot about > himself and reincarnated in all the consciousness in the world, and those > consciousness through their interactions establish contexts and contexts > give birth to meaning/qualia. This way, God gets to know himself. Is the > only way. > > On Monday, 22 April 2019 15:48:32 UTC+3, Terren Suydam wrote: >> >> So to summarize: >> >> - We lose: causality, determinism, prediction, and any hope of >> understanding the universe without getting into the minds of competing >> consciousnesses, some proportion of which don't inhabit biological bodies >> - We gain: >> >> Can you help me out with that second line? Why should anyone take your >> theory seriously when it means jettisoning science? What's the payoff? >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
