On 8/24/2019 1:35 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
That seems more like the arithmetical explanation of the quantum
indeterminacy. The thermodynamics would be more related to some
identification of the length of a finite computation and its code.
A short code leading to a long computation would contain more
energy than a short code leading to a short computation, up to
some constant. But the length of the computation is not enough,
and it is better to use the depth of it (following Bennett). The
UD would have infinite “energy", like arithmetic, but the program
“10 GOTO 10” despite leading to an infinite computation has
basically no energy at all.
Do you envision there being any special properties (for instance, in
the amplifications of the measure) of those programs shorter than the
dovetailer, in terms of their contribution to to the statistics of the
machine psychology?
I'd like to know what the "statistics" are. Given all these values
floating around there can be infinitely many statistics formed.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/f95baf8d-60d6-2858-86f9-64bfbc2c63a8%40verizon.net.
