On 8/26/2019 5:51 AM, Jason Resch wrote:
It is generally impossible to differentiate a random sequence from one
produced by an algorithm. What you may take as evidence of randomness
could instead be the output of a complex deterministic algorithm.
If QM required collapse, or if the universe had to be envisioned as an
evolving 3d space, rather than a static 4d spacetime, I would agree
with you that would be strong evidence against mathematical existence,
but since both of these ideas have been shown as unnecessary
complications of the simpler physical view (i.e. spactime, and no
collapse qm) I consider those successes to be evidence in favor of
mathematical existence.
You consider it evidence that you can imagine something. I don't.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/f47f6094-5a07-cddb-988f-414b189e7860%40verizon.net.
