On Thursday, September 19, 2019, Alan Grayson <agrayson2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Thursday, September 19, 2019 at 6:56:25 PM UTC-6, stathisp wrote: >> >> >> >> On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 09:47, Alan Grayson <agrays...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Thursday, September 19, 2019 at 2:31:18 PM UTC-6, stathisp wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 01:15, Alan Grayson <agrays...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thursday, September 19, 2019 at 7:47:44 AM UTC-6, Quentin Anciaux >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Le jeu. 19 sept. 2019 à 15:37, Alan Grayson <agrays...@gmail.com> a >>>>>> écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thursday, September 19, 2019 at 5:02:11 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 16 Sep 2019, at 17:18, Alan Grayson <agrays...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Monday, September 16, 2019 at 9:00:46 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 14 Sep 2019, at 05:22, Alan Grayson <agrays...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Friday, September 13, 2019 at 4:08:23 PM UTC-6, John Clark >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:26 PM Alan Grayson < >>>>>>>>>> agrays...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> *> Carroll also believes that IF the universe is infinite, then >>>>>>>>>>> there must exist exact copies of universes and ourselves. This is >>>>>>>>>>> frequently claimed by the MWI true believers, but never, AFAICT, >>>>>>>>>>> proven, or >>>>>>>>>>> even plausibly argued. What's the argument for such a claim?* >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Of course it's been proven! It's simple math, there are only a >>>>>>>>>> finite number of ways the atoms in your body, or even the entire >>>>>>>>>> OBSERVABLE >>>>>>>>>> universe, can be arranged so obviously if the entire universe is >>>>>>>>>> infinite >>>>>>>>>> then there is going to have to be copies, an infinite number of them >>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>> fact. Max Tegmark has even calculated how far you'd have to go >>>>>>>>>> to see such a thing. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What I think you're missing (and Tegmark) is the possibility of >>>>>>>>> UNcountable universes. In such case, one could imagine new universes >>>>>>>>> coming >>>>>>>>> into existence forever and ever, without any repeats. Think of the >>>>>>>>> number >>>>>>>>> of points between 0 and 1 on the real line, each point associated >>>>>>>>> with a >>>>>>>>> different universe. AG >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Tegmark missed this? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Deutsch did not, and in his book “fabric of reality”, he gave >>>>>>>>> rather good argument in favour of Everett-type of multiverse having >>>>>>>>> non >>>>>>>>> countable universe. That makes sense with mechanism which give raise >>>>>>>>> to a >>>>>>>>> continuum (2^aleph_0) of histories, but the “equivalence class” >>>>>>>>> brought by >>>>>>>>> the measure can have lower cardinality, or bigger. Open problem, to >>>>>>>>> say the >>>>>>>>> least. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *What you're not addressing is that with uncountable universes -- >>>>>>>> which I haven't categorically denied could arise -- it's not obvious >>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>> any repeats necessarily occur. I don't believe any repeats occur. AG * >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I assume the mechanist hypothesis, which shows that the repeat >>>>>>>> exist, indeendly of the cardinality of the number of histories. At some >>>>>>>> point the difference are not more relevant, due to the Digital >>>>>>>> mechanist >>>>>>>> truncate, which makes the repeats even more numerous in the non >>>>>>>> countable >>>>>>>> case. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *I don't believe in repeats and I haven't seen any proofs that they >>>>>>> occur, just assertions from the usual suspects. AG * >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Imagine a movie in 1280x720 pixels, then the same in 1920x1080 >>>>>> pixels then in 3840x2160 pixels... always the same but with more and more >>>>>> "precision", once you are at the correct substitution level (the level at >>>>>> which your consciousness is preserved) then any more precise simulation >>>>>> thant the ones at the correct level (which exists by assumption and there >>>>>> are an infinity of them) does not make any difference, but there are an >>>>>> infinity of them (at the correct level and below it). >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Let's suppose we correspond possible universes with the positive >>>>> integers, and also assume there's a property with uncountable outcomes, >>>>> such as a continuous mass in some range for any particle of your choice. >>>>> No >>>>> matter how many countable universes you can imagine, there's no necessity >>>>> for any repeats of the mass of your particle; hence, no repeats of any >>>>> universe. AG >>>>> >>>> >>>> If finite precision of a continuous quantity is used, the outcomes are >>>> not uncountable. >>>> >>>>> -- >>>> Stathis Papaioannou >>>> >>> >>> I specifically used a COUNTABLE model as a possible counter example of >>> the necessary existence of copies. AG >>> >> >> Do you think the number of mental states a human can possibly have is >> finite, countably infinite or uncountably infinite? >> >> >> -- >> Stathis Papaioannou >> > > What I have shown is that it's hypothetically possible to have countable > universes wherein there are no repeats, no exact copies. AG > It might be imaginable but there being no duplicates of any finite spaces within an infinite space violates the Bekenstein bound and holographic principle. Jason > >> >> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> >> Virus-free. >> www.avast.com >> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> >> <#m_7809505840903152737_CAH=2ypVLGJwvoq=f6XM0hYSNmH26-kQtw4t88idsKffPz=xmSA@mail.gmail.com_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ > msgid/everything-list/997f6fad-8042-45ec-b1a6-67a20d36a7a4%40googlegroups. > com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/997f6fad-8042-45ec-b1a6-67a20d36a7a4%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CA%2BBCJUiuoKWLnTMTfTjEEBymUrEX7VpzDG-64Vj69nM_UfUp-w%40mail.gmail.com.
