On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 3:12 AM 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List < everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> On 9/30/2019 11:06 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote: > > You say the light carrying the >> information isn't coherent, but it's not just the light that carries the >> information; it's information encoded in the wave function of the >> environment. > > > That information encoded in the wave function of the environment has to be > coherent if the impossible branches are to cancel out. And that coherence > must originate in the measurement interactions that Alice and Bob perform. > And that is non-local, since Bob and Alice are space like separated. > > > You're right. > You're conceding? I expected more of an argument..... You couldn't scan the relevant section of Carroll's book and send it to me, could you? Please. I would like to see how Carroll attempts to get out of the non-locality issue..... Bruce -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLQb076CzUR34yhvcXWW0NyjLR0bcagvSjAi-%2B8JKy2eLA%40mail.gmail.com.
