On Thursday, October 3, 2019 at 4:24:15 AM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > > Finding Sabine Hossenfelder there ... > > David Appell 10:49 PM, October 02, 2019 > > Can't one of you please tell us dummies how creating an entirely new > branched off world requires no new energy? > > None of the enlightened people here has stooped to answer this small but > significant question. They don't even try. Please try. Assume we're stupid. > > > > Sabine Hossenfelder 12:30 AM, October 03, 2019 > David, > > The reason that the "enlightened people" do not answer this question is > that it has been answered thousands of times and you could easily answer > your question by doing as much as asking Google. That you come here > nevertheless to ask this question, one more time, demonstrates that you are > not really interested in an answer but merely want to troll. > > Energy conservation is not violated because to correctly sum up the total > energy, you have to weigh the energy in each branch with the probability of > that branch. This works the way it always works in quantum mechanics. There > is nothing new going on here, nothing controversial, and nothing > interesting. > > > > http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2019/09/the-trouble-with-many-worlds.html?showComment=1569889923590#c1373154727748966620 > > @philipthrift >
Why would the energy of a branch be related to its probability of occurrance? One can imagine a very low probability, so low that it can't even contain copies of the experimenter. Totally ridiculous! AG -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/619ee3ca-0a42-417d-8e1a-abca17db031b%40googlegroups.com.
