> On 4 Oct 2019, at 00:53, Philip Thrift <cloudver...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> The question is about quantum many worlds. Not cosmology.

Cosmology assumes the quantum at a cosmological scale, and it is where a 
collapse makes the less sense. Who would observe and be responsible for the 
collapse of the universal wave? Belinfante estimates that the Copenhagen-von 
Neuman formulation of QM requires an external god looking at the universe, like 
materialism requires a god selecting a unique computation, but that’s no more 
doing science.

François Englert, who worked in quantum cosmology, was very annoyed by the 
collapse problem, and was relieved that it makes sense to just abandon the 
collapse idea.  The collapse is usually not even defined in any intelligible 
sense, and it introduces a duality incompatible with Mechanism, but also with 
the scientific attitude, I would say.

With mechanism, there is only one consciousness which differentiates into many 
1p histories, and they interfere statistically, notably by allowing a 1p plural 
observable and sharable reality.

Why to believe in any “world"? 

Bruno




> 
> @philipthrift
> 
> On Thursday, October 3, 2019 at 5:22:02 PM UTC-5, Jason wrote:
> Energy isn't even conserved under conventional cosmological models.  The 
> expansion of space causes a loss of radiation energy, and if vacuum energy is 
> non zero (also an assumed by current models) the Hubble expansion is creating 
> energy.
> 
> Jason
> 
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 2:33 PM Philip Thrift <cloud...@gmail.com 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
> 
> There is no way for the Many Worldists to squirrel out of it.
> 
> Run the code
> 
> Getting started with Qiskit: while exploring the quantum world, let’s play 
> the coin flip game!
> 
> https://medium.com/@esobimpe/getting-started-with-qiskit-while-exploring-the-quantum-world-lets-play-the-coin-flip-game-2319bb293c6a
>  
> <https://medium.com/@esobimpe/getting-started-with-qiskit-while-exploring-the-quantum-world-lets-play-the-coin-flip-game-2319bb293c6a>
> 
> with a loop of 100.
> 
> if MWI is true there will be 2^100 worlds.
> 
> In each world there is a Sean Carroll looking at a different result.
> 
> @philipthrift
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Thursday, October 3, 2019 at 2:07:28 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/3/2019 10:44 AM, Philip Thrift wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On Thursday, October 3, 2019 at 12:39:09 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On 10/3/2019 6:29 AM, Alan Grayson wrote: 
>> > Why would the energy of a branch be related to its probability of 
>> > occurrance? One can imagine a very low probability, so low that it 
>> > can't even contain copies of the experimenter. Totally ridiculous! AG 
>> 
>> It it's probability were zero would you still count its energy? 
>> 
>> Brent 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> But MWI eliminates probabilities.
> 
> That's its problem. But it has to explain the appearance of probabilities.  
> 
>> 
>> World W branches into W0 and W1, then W00, W01, W10, W11, then ...
>> 
>> They all exist in MWI.
>  
> But WA, WB, WC,... don't. it's a popular fallacy that MWI means everything 
> happens.
> 
> Brent
> 
>> 
>> Given a world (in Sabine's MWI above) W where there is a computer C with a 
>> quantum random number generator, after C generates a string of 1000 0s and 
>> 1s, the  energy of the computer 
>> 
>>    C-[one thousand (0|1)s]
>> 
>> in each  leaf world of the resulting branching tree will be 1/(2^1000)th of 
>> energy of C.
>> 
>> @philipthrift 
> 
> 
> -
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/0b5dc5a9-5f16-4258-8ad6-9558833bfe8f%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/0b5dc5a9-5f16-4258-8ad6-9558833bfe8f%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/01004B8C-EF34-401D-927B-5E859E19CA16%40ulb.ac.be.

Reply via email to