On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 4:40 PM Quentin Anciaux <allco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Le ven. 4 sept. 2020 à 00:01, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List < > everything-list@googlegroups.com> a écrit : > >> Sure. But Albert's argument is that in a single, probabilistic world >> that implements Born's rule, the number of scientist who find something >> contrary to Born's rule goes to zero as the number of repetitions >> increases. But in the multiverse there are always contrary worlds and, >> while their fraction decreases, their number increases with repetitions. >> > > That's an interpretation... because I think there is no increasing or > decreasing of numbers of worlds.... there are an infinity of them always, > similar / identical "world" differentiate but there is no increase or > decrease, there is no meaningfull way of "counting"... The frequency is all > there is. > That does not detract from the fact that in Everett, the low probability worlds always occur with probability one. In other words, the theory is intrinsically self-contradictory -- incoherent. Bruce -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLRtrQw8kc_grKMxRYLpwC-fJuX07sAfpWOMGYYtEVZp%3Dw%40mail.gmail.com.
