AG asked: does randomness imply no-FTL-signaling? Let me ask: does determinism imply FTL-signaling?
A is one of the two wings of a Bell apparatus i is the observable to be measured in A x is the possible value of i B is the other wing of a Bell apparatus j is the observable to be measured in B y is the possible value of j Lambda are hidden variables p are probabilities If we write p_[A,Lambda] (x|i,j) = p_[A,Lambda] (x|i) p_[B,Lambda] (y|i,j) = p_[B,Lambda] (y|j) the above is a sort of "locality" condition, since the value x only depends on the observable i, and the value y only depends on the observable j. In a (hypothetical https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&sxsrf=ALeKk02Cur06my_H17d_9fUXbVDqBH5ESQ:1608715874782&q=hypothetical&spell=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiAy4rS5ePtAhXLO-wKHWX6DTYQkeECKAB6BAgEEDU ) deterministic theory (but reproducing QM) the above "locality" condition is violated. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/871899580.451822.1608716365874%40mail1.libero.it.
