Do note l professori, that this idea even to a shmoop like myself occurred 
decades ago as a explanation over how or why no ETI signals! So I am real good 
with your comment and observation that yeah how well a radio signal propagates 
through the Milky Way may be highly and profoundly limited. So I'm not exactly 
biting through my lower lip at your reminder. And I say thanks! Signals no 
propagate, signals no get received. No ticket no shirty. And I say thank ee' 
master.

Sent from the all new AOL app for Android 
 
  On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 6:58 AM, Lawrence 
Crowell<goldenfieldquaterni...@gmail.com> wrote:   Sorry to say, but radio 
signals may not make it that far through the galaxy, Charged plasma in 
interstellar space may attenuate any EM signal.
LC
On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 12:04 AM <spudboy...@aol.com> wrote:

And, there is this article-
How advanced civilizations could leave us a message of their presence.
We Were Here - Nautilus | Science Connected

Seems like radio would be a lot easier? Maybe this would offer up aliens with a 
very large budget? 

-----Original Message-----
From: spudboy100 via Everything List <everything-list@googlegroups.com>
To: goldenfieldquaterni...@gmail.com <goldenfieldquaterni...@gmail.com>; 
everything-list@googlegroups.com <everything-list@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Mon, May 23, 2022 11:27 pm
Subject: Re: Self-Replicating Robots and Galactic Domination

Then, there's this! 
 Planets of binary stars as possible homes for alien life -- ScienceDaily
Tatooine!


-----Original Message-----
From: Lawrence Crowell <goldenfieldquaterni...@gmail.com>
To: Everything List <everything-list@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Mon, May 23, 2022 9:40 am
Subject: Re: Self-Replicating Robots and Galactic Domination

On Monday, May 23, 2022 at 7:22:47 AM UTC-5 johnk...@gmail.com wrote:

On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 7:18 PM Lawrence Crowell <goldenfield...@gmail.com> 
wrote:


>I suspect there may only be a few thousand planets with complex life in any 
>galaxy. I would then say that given life has been here in complex form for 600 
>million years and that Homo sapiens have been here 100,000 years this means at 
>any given time using this as a guide  each planet with complex life has a 
>1.7x10^{-4} probability of having intelligent life. This is even smaller when 
>one considers how long we have had advanced technology, or about 3x10^{-7}. So 
>this might mean that at any given time a galaxy might have 1/1000 chance of 
>having ETI. Maybe then on the Hubble frame, or on our past light cone, there 
>is on average an ETI on every 1000 galaxies.

The trouble is it's extremely difficult to obtain useful statistics if you only 
have one example. On Earth life occurred almost as soon as liquid water could 
exist on its surface, but does that mean life is inherently easy to make? Maybe 
not because the only example we have is a planet in which not only life 
developed but intelligent life did, so life had to have started quickly here, 
perhaps freakishly quickly, because if it had taken much longer the sun would 
be turning into a red giant about the time intelligent creatures started 
building a civilization, and that would make any sort of life on the planet 
impossible. And even after life started all you had was simple Prokaryotic 
cells, it took another 2 billion years for far more complex Eukaryotic cells to 
evolve, and then another 1.5 billion years for multicellular life to evolve, 
and 500 million years after that to get a technological civilization which only 
happened a few thousand years ago. 
How typical is any of this? Nobody knows but we have hints; most major 
evolutionary developments, such as the invention of the eye and flight, evolved 
independently more than once, sometimes dozens of times but intelligence, 
defined as the ability to make a radio, occurred only once. But even when we 
look deep into space with enormous telescopes we don't see even the slightest 
hint of engineering.  

A galaxy dominated by von Neumann probes would like bare some signatures of 
such. So far nothing is evident. Of course galaxies we observer are in the 
past. We could just be one of the early IGUS or intelligent life forms on the 
Hubble frame. 
LC 
  
> Now consider there is probably some filter that selects out ETIs. Either they 
> annihilate themselves with nuclear explosive, or they collapse the life 
> support system of their planet or .   , a range of things we may do to 
> ourselves that prevents them from ever developing a von Neumann probe. 

The human race only needs to hang together for a few more decades before a von 
Neumann probe gets made, I don't think it's reasonable to expect that every 
single civilization without exception destroys itself just an instant before it 
has the ability to make such a thing, especially when you consider that if 
intelligence is as common as some claim then some of those civilizations must 
have started on planets where the element Uranium is much rarer in its surface 
crust than it is on the Earth. On Earth's surface Uranium is not particularly 
rare, it's far more common than Gold, but if it was as rare as Osmium, Rhodium 
or Iridium we'd have no nuclear weapons today and wouldn't have any in the 
future until asteroid mining became practical, and by then making a von Neumann 
probe would be practical too.

 John K Clark    See what's on my new list at  Extropolis
swl
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/8c336ffe-4f23-4c99-b16c-823e601da831n%40googlegroups.com.
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/963607691.1164396.1653362852700%40mail.yahoo.com.

  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/1210949562.1561480.1653485838288%40mail.yahoo.com.

Reply via email to