On pure cosmology, and what we have measured, Carroll is great, a good physicist, but like LC, believes he comprehends what i going on. They don't, even as a physics outsider I can detect this. If there's an argument here about quantum erasure, I will go instead of Stanford, I'd head for Harvard, where Strominger hangs his hat. https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691179506/lectures-on-the-infrared-structure-of-gravity-and-gauge-theory
Also we now live in a time where we detect that the universe, cosmologically isThe Universe Is Not Locally Real, and the Physics Nobel Prize Winners Proved It https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-universe-is-not-locally-real-and-the-physics-nobel-prize-winners-proved-it/ It doesn't appear that quantum erasure at interstellar levels is accurate? It may be great for computer security though at the chip level however? Huzzah! -----Original Message----- From: John Clark <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thu, Oct 27, 2022 7:16 pm Subject: Re: Apparently objective quantum wave function collapse doesn't occur On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 6:55 PM Bruce Kellett <[email protected]> wrote: > You can delay the choice as to whether or not to utilize the information > about which slit the particle went through until long after that particle has > hit the screen No you cannot, you must perform the quantum erasure after the particle passes through the slits but before it hits the screen, although that time can be as long as you want it to be, you just have to increase the distance between the slits in the screen. > and formed its permanent image on the screen. Once a large-scale macro change has been made, such as would happen when the particle hits the screen, it would be virtually impossible to get all the trillions of particles in the screen to become identical again and cause the two universes to merge back together again. > It cannot decide whether or not to interfere with itself to produce an > interference pattern at that time -- the decision about where to hit the > screen has long since been made. Huh? You don't get to decide where the particle hits the screen. > I cannot recommend strongly enough that you read and study the article by > Carroll -- it might rid you of a number of misconceptions that you have built > up over time: Misconceptions that apparently you are unable to clearly state. I am very well acquainted with Carroll's blog and I'll wager I've read more stuff by Carroll than you have. John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis cbr -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv1pyEEzyVf%3DZ8%2BS_5CU8szZ7-u2-zW%3D%3Dd2Qy3kLVibSUQ%40mail.gmail.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/755076283.555704.1666913678249%40mail.yahoo.com.
