On Friday, November 22, 2024 at 6:21:18 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote:
I recommend the lectures of Jacob Barandes. He has developed an interpretation of QM which shows how QM is related to classical stochastic processes and which avoids the problems I see in other interpretations. He makes a distinction between ontic and epistemic layers in the interpretations which I think clarifies things a lot. *Ontic? Is any equation ontic? Have you tried to kick one? AG* "A New Formulation of Quantum Theory" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sshJyD0aWXg "New Foundations for Quantum Theory" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dB16TzHFvj0 "Why We Shouldn't Believe in Hilbert Spaces Anymore" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmaSAG4J6nw *This seems promising. AG * Of course there are also papers on the same topic: The Stochastic-Quantum Theorem arXiv:2309.03085 *Doesn't "stochastic" imply the classical theory where ignorance is assumed of individual members of an ensemble, so when applied to quantum theory wouldn't it imply the Ignorance Interpretation of the superposed wf? AG* The Stochastic-Quantum Correspondence arxiv:2302.10778 The Minimal Modal Interpretation of Quantum Theory arXiv:1405.6755 Brent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/89529bbc-2eaa-4b34-b9c2-c4040a92436dn%40googlegroups.com.
