On Tuesday, December 17, 2024 at 12:20:20 AM UTC-7 Bruce Kellett wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 6:00 PM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote: On Monday, December 16, 2024 at 11:48:17 PM UTC-7 Bruce Kellett wrote: How is non-local defined? Does it imply instantaneous, or faster than light transference of information? AG I defined non-local above: whatever happens at A does not affect B and *vice versa*. It has nothing to do with faster-than-light transfer of information. If there was some FTL transfer between A and B, then the effect would be local. The idea that non-locality means FTL effects is a common confusion. That idea is totally wrong. Bruce It might be, as you write, a common confusion, but how else can a measurement at A not effect a measurement at B , and vice versa, and yet be correlated, without faster-than-light transference of information. It does seem to me that non-local implies denial of realism. AG You just have to stop thinking about it in classical terms. Bruce If my interpretation is wrong, this is too classical, what's the correct interpretation? AG -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/92ab552b-8b19-4460-99e6-539b2d13eb8cn%40googlegroups.com.
