On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 2:11 PM Russell Standish <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 12:29:57PM +1100, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> >
> > It does not prevent a probabilistic interpretation, but it does not give
> one
> > either. You have assumed statistical physics, which introduces a large
> dose of
> > probability theory. That does not come from the deterministic theory --
> you
> > have to introduce it from elsewhere.
> >
> > So with quantum mechanics. The wave function, being deterministic, does
> not
> > have a probabilistic interpretation until you introduce one from
> elsewhere.
>
> I'm well aware of that. I guess you're disputing the "MWI is nothing
> but the Schroedinger equation" statement that John Clark sometimes
> makes.
>

Yes. At least JC is consistent with this, as are people like Carroll,
Deutsch and Wallace. I find it harder to deal with people, like Quentin,
who are basically dishonest; who claim to be working with Everettian
quantum mechanics, but continually introduce ideas from elsewhere -- ideas
that have no basis in unitary quantum mechanics.

As soon as you have self-location indeterminancy (or first person
> indeterminancy, I think we called it here), probabilities march right
> on in. And as soon as you have computationalism (and I would argue
> functionalism), self-location indeterminancy marches right on in. That
> was the point of Bruno Marchal's Universal Dovetailer Argument.
>

But that has never made any realistic connection with either quantum
mechanics or with observational results.

So the question is how would you do the MWI _without_
> probabilities. David Deutsch is working on a possible solution to
> that, although I'm a little sceptical he can make it work.
>

I think your scepticism is not misplaced. Deutsch has a tendency to go off
the rails on occasion.

Bruce

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLTMga-UNDPg%2BEzKorrewxgOtzk%2BvHEeVUX097G0sWTg1w%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to