> to be honest, I did not notice any "program start parameters" you are > mentioning now, to be in the original post of this thread.
See also: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-hackers/2020-November/msg00000.html Repetition: elfring@Sonne:~/Projekte/Bau/Evolution/3.36.5/Probe> LANG=C LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/elfring/Projekte/Bau/Evolution/3.36.5/Probe/home/elfring/Projekte/Bau/Evolution/3.36.5/Probe/lib/evolution:/home/elfring/Projekte/Bau/Evolution/3.36.5/Probe/home/elfring/Projekte/Bau/Evolution/3.36.5/Probe/lib/evolution/plugins:/home/elfring/Projekte/Bau/Evolution/3.36.5/Probe/home/elfring/Projekte/Bau/Evolution/3.36.5/Probe/lib/evolution/modules home/elfring/Projekte/Bau/Evolution/3.36.5/Probe/bin/evolution By the way: I installed the software package “libwebkit2gtk-4_0-37” (2.30.2-1.1) yesterday afternoon. Now I stumble also on the following error message. home/elfring/Projekte/Bau/Evolution/3.36.5/Probe/bin/evolution: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so.37: undefined symbol: wpe_fdo_initialize_shm > More importantly, you did not tell us *how* you build the Evolution. > You use CMake, of course, but that's far from the answer for the *how*. I wonder about such an information. Another repetition: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/evolution/-/issues/1199 elfring@Sonne:~/Projekte/Gnome/Evolution/lokal> git checkout 3.36.5 && cmake -G Ninja -S . -B ~/Projekte/Bau/Evolution/3.36.5 > Anyway, the Edit->Plugin Manager is added as an evolution-plugin-manager.so > module. Thanks for such background information. > Maybe Evolution claims runtime > warnings on the console, Some were displayed. > or it doesn't load any module (if that's > true - you didn't tell us - then you may see an empty Evolution window. The application window was usable for a simple test run on my system. > I mean really empty, no Mail, no Contacts, no Calendar, ... just a gray I did not observe such an effect. > Why is that so is the question. It can be that your CMAKE_INSTALL_DIR > doesn't match the place you install the files to (due to the DESTDIR usage?). I find it unlikely that this detail matters here actually. > Do fix that and the things will work. From my point of view, > you misunderstand and misuse the DESTDIR variable. But I can be wrong, > in either or both statements. I wonder about such feedback. > Again, anybody else using the DESTDIR > uses it successfully, I got the impression that this variable is usually working also for me as expected. > only you have problem with it. * I can stumble on additional software surprises. * Other developers can not benefit from such a variable because of special file systems. > If you are doing some magics > nobody has an idea of, then you are in it on your own. I'm sorry. Magic items will probably not be needed for the clarification of software behaviour. > Note this is not about alternative build ways, you can build the software > the way it works the best for you. If you have issues, then try the > Building wiki page, check what you've done differently and try to find > out what you do wrong, because you surely do something wrong. Who would like to help with mentioned program start arguments and related dependencies? Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
