On 22 Mar 2001 00:54:14 -0500, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
> On 22 Mar 2001 08:54:23 +1030, Not Zed wrote:
> > Why move all of the standard ones to the end?
>
> In my stuff, I always keep the standard ones at the top, and I don't
> want that to be changed.
I know this is a bit old, but I have an argument about this.
We should have standard ones at the bottom. This way we get better
testing on our headers. If we include any types that are needed from
standard headers, we find out that we're missing them.
Also, and more importantly, I think we should move the include of the .h
matching the current .c to the top of the list (just under config.h.)
For example, e-table.c should have the config.h include first followed
by the e-table.h include. This will make e-table.c compilation fail if
e-table.h doesn't include everything it needs and thus we won't find
this later when someone else tries to use e-table.h.
Actually, if we follow this second one always, the first one doesn't
matter.
Thanks,
Chris
_______________________________________________
evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
