At 02 June, 2001 Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> In what way is procmail "better"? You can do regex filtering with
> Evolution's native filters too.
Ok, I currently have procmail creating monthly archives, so all my mail this month is
put into mail/current/<mailbox> and then the next month it is moved to mail/previous.
Then I'm going to let procmail make a tar.gz of it the next month (this is not
implemented yet.).
To make this work procmail also generates the .mailboxes file to match the mailboxes
so IMAP works nice.
I'd love to see evolution handle this, but currnently procmail IS better on filtering
mail!
//Snaggen
> If you send me a patch, I'll commit it (assuming it works and doesn't
> cause problems).
>
> Jeff
>
> On 02 Jun 2001 00:49:26 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 06:11:25PM -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > > This is in bugzilla but will not likely make it into 1.0. Any particular
> > > reason you want to pass it off to another program to filter??
> >
> > Isn't procmail a teeny weeny better for filtering?
> >
> > But then, if I was using procmail...
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
--
____________________________________________________________________________
Mattias Eriksson E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tvistev�gen 26 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
907 36 UMEA Tel: 090-198800
SWEDEN 070-5636769
'I don't fight for a cause Hemsida: http://www.acc.umu.se/~snaggen
I fight for the fight' PGP: http://www.acc.umu.se/~snaggen/snaggen.asc
____________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
