On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 15:58 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On 19 August 2013 15:25, Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mard...@rocketmail.com> > wrote: > On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 15:08 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > I would say that it's a matter of opinion whether this is > correct > > behaviour or not. I don't know of a precise specification of > what the > > timeout semantics are supposed to be (other than the code) > so you might > > need to propose it as a change in BZ. > > > Patrick, I agree that different behaviours could be wanted, > but there > anyway is a "feature" I would call a bug. If an unread mail is > marked > while emptying the trash, this mail will be marked as read > after trash > is emptied. > > > That sounds like something different. There are two ways to empty the > Trash: > > > 1) Select File->Empty Trash > 2) Visit the Trash virtual folder and expunge it (Ctrl-E) > > > If you mean (1), it does sound like a bug. If you mean (2), then it's > not so clear.
I mean (1), since I talked about an unread mail as marked and if I would select the trash folder first, only a mail that anyway should be deleted could be marked ;). Regards, Ralf PS: Now I wouldn't have missed to choose the correct account, but Cc'ing was a good idea :). _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
