On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 15:08 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > I would say that it's a matter of opinion whether this is correct > behaviour or not. I don't know of a precise specification of what the > timeout semantics are supposed to be (other than the code) so you might > need to propose it as a change in BZ.
Patrick, I agree that different behaviours could be wanted, but there anyway is a "feature" I would call a bug. If an unread mail is marked while emptying the trash, this mail will be marked as read after trash is emptied. Regards, Ralf _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
