Hi at all Hi Poc STOP! I do not want political diskussion, I want solutions. Sorry my mistake, I did not know that this is so highly explosive here.
Regards Ralph ---- Patrick O'Callaghan <[email protected]> schrieb: > On Sat, 2015-07-11 at 15:39 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > On Sat, 2015-07-11 at 14:09 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > That wasn't the point I was making. You said something about Google > > > > > > and the NSA. The question of legal decryption is entirely separate. > > > > Another subscriber mentioned Google and the NSA, it wasn't me. > > Apologies, you are correct. > > > Btw. even if mails wouldn't get sniffed and analysed, we can't expect > > that deleting from a provider's server will really shred the mails on > > this server and we completely don't have impact to other servers > > those > > mails passed. IMO mails that aren't encrypted anyway should be > > deleted > > after retrieving and they are better preserved on a private computer. > > Unless you're running an SMTP server on your own machine, to which > everyone who ever sends you email connects *directly* (from their own > machine, not using a webmail system, and of course using an encrypted > channel), then your mail is going through multiple intermediaries, any > one of which can keep a copy of it. > > This is the way email has always worked. Deleting messages from the > final stage IMAP or POP server after download does nothing to prevent > this. > > poc > > _______________________________________________ > evolution-list mailing list > [email protected] > To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list [email protected] To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
