On Sat, 2017-12-23 at 13:10 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Sat, 23 Dec 2017 12:05:04 +0000, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > Btw. I need an MUA that comes close to my needs and at the same time > > > could be used for a rolling release, as well as using the same > > > version for another distro's long term support release. The solution > > > for me is using Claws for the rolling release as well as the LTS > > > release of another distro and at the same time to use Evolution for > > > the rolling release model distro only, too provide some "things" > > > Claws doesn't provide. > > > > Not sure what you mean but in any case that appears to be a different > > topic. > > It is a different topic.
Then it should be a separate thread. We're drifting very far from the OP's topic here. > I'm talking about dependency chains. The more > features, the more likely more dedicated dependencies are required. IOW > it's easy to compile a release of Claws against the latest and > greatest, as well as against aged dependencies. Compiling a dedicated > version of Evolution comes with less headroom regarding the required > dependencies. Please take this to an independent thread if you want to discuss it. poc _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
