> past. To make Evolution for Windows would be reinventing the wheel > since Windows already has Outlook. If your Windows users are already
Yes, Outlook is a GREAT program, but: - It's microsoft, so it will NEVER run on Linux... - It's costly > using Outlook, then what would be the difference (aside from the cost, > but it is my understanding that if you've already purchased outlook and > it works for you, there shouldn't be any reason to shell out money for a > newer version, just keep up on the security patches. hehe) But the cost is IMPORTANT! Microsoft is changing the way it license things to go to a "Pay each year for a thing you already have" !!! The cost of Microsoft products IS a problem. > I hate to sound like the Linux community should be selfish because that > goes against what they are about, but if there was a Windows port of > Evolution, that would be one less reason for someone to want to switch > to Linux anyway. Selfish? maybe. I know some graphics students who No, here we want to switch to OpenOffice for win+linux. But we must keep Outlook for windows. It's a problem because if Evo was available on Windows, then we'll switch to OpenOffice+Evo on Win+Linux -jec _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
