On Thu, 2002-09-05 at 16:00, Gene Imes wrote: > This may work for you but not for me. Why do you care what my motives > for wanting something. I don't want to forward email as an attachment I > want it inline and If the email source is displayed and I want to > forward it then why shouldn't I be able to do this? Example: I get some > spam and know who the originating ISP is so I want to send forward an > email to them requesting they remedy the situation and the proof is the > email source. I can cut an paste but if it is already displayed then why > can't that be inlined? Well, it could be if the idea if maximum > flexibility isn't killed all together.
In that example, forward as attachment is exactly what you want. You don't want the headers to be touched one bit, and forward inline would insert lines, expose it to wrapping, etc. Forward as attachment ensures that what the ISP receives is exactly what you received. Ross -- Ross Burton Software Engineer OneEighty Software Ltd Tel: +44 20 8680 8712 Cygnet House Fax: +44 20 8680 8453 12-14 Sydenham Road [EMAIL PROTECTED] Croydon, Surrey CR9 2ET, UK http://www.180sw.com./ ==================================================================== Under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers (RIP) Act 2000 together with any and all Regulations in force pursuant to the Act OneEighty Software Ltd reserves the right to monitor any or all incoming or outgoing communications as provided for under the Act _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
