It's fixed in the latest snap!!! It took just over 2 minutes to load up all my folders. Thanks to everyone for their help!
Skadz On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 12:13, Ryan P Skadberg wrote: > I filed a bug as 30803. Let me know if there is anything else I can do > to help debug this. This is still happening as of the 200209200601 > snap. > > Skadz > > On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 06:34, Not Zed wrote: > > On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 01:12, Ryan P Skadberg wrote: > > > Oops, I think I mis-spoke here :) > > > > > > I meant that it took 2-3 hours to load of the folder LIST on the left > > > hand side. During this evolution was totally un-usable. I have been > > > doing some testing on this all morning and it does NOT seem like it is > > > an evolution-mail issue (as it has the list done in less than min), but > > > it seems as if it is an issue with maybe gal or e-table or something. > > > > > > If I run evolution-mail with verbose debugging, I see the folder list > > > all come up and then the main evolution process eats about 90% of my CPU > > > for a long long time. I've been trying some different things to see > > > what is going on. When I straced evolution, it was doing a lot of > > > writes, but it was stuff that was un-readable by me. > > > > Ouch. > > > > Sounds like a recent change made to the shell. I knew it was slower, > > much slower, but didn't think it could stretch out to 2-3 hours. > > Particulalry since it was already extremely slow :-/ > > > > > Something like this: > > > > The strace is probably X traffic or something. > > > > > Is there any way that I could debug this better on my own? Maybe a Gal > > > debug or something? > > > > Probably not much. > > > > > I also know that I was doing some experiments with things I did last > > > week like unsubbing all my folders and re-subbing them, which took maybe > > > 5-10 minutes in the past now has the same problem and takes a long > > > time. It seems that whatever change caused this happened in the last > > > week or so. Probably about 2 or 3 snapshots ago. > > > > > > Skadz > > > > > > Once this problem is all done, folders load as quick as they always > > > have, so that was definitely not the issue, sorry if I caused some > > > confusion. > > > > Ahh cool. Well, with a *lot* of messages, it could take a long time to > > startup, we were worried that might be the problem. > -- > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Ryan P Skadberg E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Director of Technology U: http://www.mindstorm.com/ > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > GPG fingerprint = 0B97 F771 E7D2 69B2 FF5C 5693 4E25 7E77 DEF0 CA4B > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Ryan P Skadberg E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Director of Technology U: http://www.mindstorm.com/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- GPG fingerprint = 0B97 F771 E7D2 69B2 FF5C 5693 4E25 7E77 DEF0 CA4B -----------------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
