uh, yea... and yet the maintainers say you're wrong. go figure.
Jeff On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 20:13, Ronald Kuetemeier wrote: > On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 13:35, Chris Toshok wrote: > > On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 01:48, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > back to kernel 2.4.* i can run evolution (1.2.1 on debian/woody) > > > fine. Anyone has an idea what the issue with evolution and linux > > > kernel 2.5 could be? > > > > > > > 2.5 is broken? > > > Sorry but _NO_ it's not 2.5, Gnome is broken, > you can read all about it and get a patch on the evolution-hackers list. > > Ronald > > > chris > > > > _______________________________________________ > > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution > > > > > _______________________________________________ > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
