On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 10:41:43PM +0200, Mika Liljeberg wrote: > By the way, your patch is included in Debian unstable > [liborbit0-0.5.17-5]: > > > --- orbit-0.5.17.orig/src/IIOP/connection.c > +++ orbit-0.5.17/src/IIOP/connection.c > @@ -459,6 +459,7 @@ > fd_cnx->u.usock.sun_family = AF_UNIX; > getpeername(GIOP_CONNECTION_GET_FD(fd_cnx), > (struct sockaddr *)&fd_cnx->u.usock, &n); > + fd_cnx->u.usock.sun_path[0] = '\0'; > break; > > #ifdef HAVE_IPV6 > > It may not be the correct fix but at least it solves the immediate > problem. It is the only place to fix it without interfering with other programs, that's why I did fixed it there. Good to see that some distributions prefer a stable system. Ronald > > Cheers, > > MikaL > > > On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 20:23, Ronald Kuetemeier wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 05:40:45PM +0100, Joaquim Fellmann wrote: > > > On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 02:13, Ronald Kuetemeier wrote: > > > > > > > Sorry but _NO_ it's not 2.5, Gnome is broken, > > > > you can read all about it and get a patch on the evolution-hackers list. > > > > > > Wrong too. > > > It seems to be Orbit assuming a kernel routine to return some value but > > > receiving something else. > > > Actually it was a kernel bug (that got fixed) on which Orbit was > > > relying. > > > Problem is that Orbit didn't get fixed. > > Maybe you should read the thread on evolution-hackers,and then contact some kernel >hackers, Alan, Dave and Al come to mind. > > My patch resets new 2.5 behavior for/in Orbit to 2.4 behavior. But the real >problem is within Gnome, so far I only hear from the Gnome/Orbit maintainers it's the >Kernel without any proof. Just saying so is not enough, I know it's kind of hard to >find a problem in a few hundred thousand kernel and Gnome/evolution source lines. >Been there done that. And if you take a look at the Gnome 2.X source you might find >that it's mood to talk about this any further, if you understand the problem. > > Ronald > > > > > > > > A message on the linux kernel mailing list is refering to a bitkeeper > > > changeset at the origin of the "evolution case". Before this changeset > > > Evolution is dealing right with kernel 2.5 and after this changeset it > > > doesn't work anymore. > > > > > > > > > See http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/linux/linux-kernel/2002-41/0444.html > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Joaquim Fellmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution > > > > _______________________________________________ > > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
_______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
