Vlad is looking at this I think we should have a discussion on this in our next EWG meeting
Tziporet -----Original Message----- From: ewg-boun...@lists.openfabrics.org [mailto:ewg-boun...@lists.openfabrics.org] On Behalf Of Steve Wise Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 5:22 PM To: edward.mascaren...@qlogic.com Cc: ewg@lists.openfabrics.org Subject: Re: [ewg] EWG/OFED meeting minutes for today (Dec 13, 2011) On 12/22/2011 02:26 PM, Edward Mascarenhas wrote: >> There is a suggestion from Eduard from Qlogic to have the backports ad >> different branches and not as today. >> He will start a mail thread on his suggestion. > > The attached file in pdf format has the proposal. It is also inlined > in text below so its easier to comment on. The pdf has 2 diagrams > which should make it easier to understand the changes that are proposed. > > Comments are welcome. > > - Edward I like this approach. I would also do the same thing with kernel_addons so that each branch is just a specific backport. What are there any disadvantages to your proposal? Did you get a chance to investigate the other backport projects from this thread? https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/9/327 Steve. _______________________________________________ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg _______________________________________________ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
