-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Information store size
> Of course, as well they should. IT limits and policies should facilitate the business of doing business. My senior management is too productive doing things other than policing the size of their mailbox. I provide them with tips and hints on how they might be more effective with e-mail and e-mail storage, but I don't slap arbitrary limits on them. Maybe my management understands disaster better then the people you guys deal with. When we told them their stupidly large mailbox attributes to general slowness of the e-mail server, longer backup and restore times, higher chance of loss of data from a recovery, and numerous other bad things, they had no problems with us taking actions to reduce the size of their mailbox. I'm glad none of you guys run my mail server for me. I'd need to have many terabytes of e-mail storage and backups and restores times that would cost me millions of dollars in business. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=exchange To subscribe: http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/ To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
