CU are behind on the terms. Why RU confused about the change? I know I get it wrong all the time myself ;)
> Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 11:02:02 -0700 > From: sbrad...@pacbell.net > To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com > Subject: Re: [Exchange] Any word on Exchange 2013 sp1 issues? > > CU update rollup...whatever the dang thing they are calling for the next > release :-) > On 3/20/2014 10:41 AM, Michael B. Smith wrote: > > No. It will be in the next CU. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com > > [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley > > Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 1:37 PM > > To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com > > Subject: Re: [Exchange] Any word on Exchange 2013 sp1 issues? > > > > There's a KB script to fix it. Final fix will be in the next update rollup. > > > > On 3/20/2014 10:32 AM, Steven Peck wrote: > >> I haven't seen any change on the Exchange blog for the AV/transport > >> issues reported. Anyone else seen any updates? My manager is pushing > >> hard to move towards it in our preproduction environment. > >> > >> Steven Peck > >> > > -- > > Got your CryptoLocker prevention in place? > > http://www.thirdtier.net/2013/10/cryptolocker-prevention-kit-updates/ > > Only one more patching days of XP.... are you ready? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Got your CryptoLocker prevention in place? > http://www.thirdtier.net/2013/10/cryptolocker-prevention-kit-updates/ > Only one more patching days of XP.... are you ready? > > >
