Is that a hint of sarcasm that I detect?
-----Original Message-----
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 9:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Over limits message
Indeed. Why stop there?
Perhaps they should have included content filtering, antivirus
functionality, attachment blocking, firewall features, the ability to change
the irrelevant port 25 telnet banner, the smell of the System Manager, the
.... Heck, why didn't they make Exchange platform neutral? Or build the OS
right in. The CD should be bootable. Ya!
What a scam!!
William
-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 9:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Over limits message
But it is not a scam.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bueffel, Scott M - CNF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:27 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Over limits message
>
>
> I knew my response would get some responses. Haven't had my caffeine.
> Well, since I don't drink anything with it, it's a moot point.
> Anyway, my point was that Erik said that requests are added in the
> next version. But
> MS has regularly added features with service packs
> (journaling, IMS domain
> blocking instead of just by IP, Mailbox manager, etc.), but
> not the ability
> to modify the storage limits message. So my response was
> simply that not
> all requests are honored, since the ability to modify the message via
> registry entries or GUI were certainly possible if they chose
> to do so.
> There certainly have been a lot of requests over the years for that
> functionality, and to offer it only through a sink in 2000
> seems kind of a
> let down.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 8:07 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Over limits message
>
>
> Ghod forbid an Exchange admin should actually dig a bit under
> the hood. The
> features is still available.
>
> Not every config option is available in the GUI. Would you consider
> Registry manipulation a scam?
>
> If the single most pressing feature you require in an email
> system, ask for
> your money back, because clearly MS doesn't know anything...
>
>
> *****************************
> * Erik Sojka, MCSE *
> * Manager, Network Services *
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
> *****************************
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bueffel, Scott M - CNF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:02 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Over limits message
> >
> >
> > Oh, please. You think it has been included in 2000? Only through
> > Event sinks. "Included" would mean a nice little GUI that lets you
> > type exactly
> > what you want to say. People have been asking for this
> since the very
> > beginning. And with each service pack it never came. They
> > simply chose not
> > to do it. So scam could be considered appropriate by some.
> >
_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
