On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Kim Cameron wrote:
> just mention in your next conversation, in your most somber engineer
> voice, that the databases should be "fluffy" with white space rather
> than dense and defragged. fluffy is the word you're looking for. :)
No no no, you want this:
"Due to possible issues concerning the dynamic nature of slack space,
combined with the low per-unit cost of direct-access magnetic storage, I
believe our most optimum solution path lies with following a continuously
available operational strategy, and negative approval of any manual
de-fragmentation process."
================
Ah.. the Baffle 'em with TechnoBabble maneuver. It works well against MBA's
with screwdrivers.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult
one. - Bruce Lee
-----Original Message-----
From: Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 5:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: When Does Microsoft Recommend Defrag of Exchange IS?
If they're smart enough to figure that out, they won't ask any more
questions. If they aren't, they still won't. ;-)
--
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not
|
| necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or
|
| organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind.
|
_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
