In which case you will probably need to look at your DR solution. You throughput is not stunning even for NTBackup (and it isn't known for speed). You make sure that you have reliable backups by testing them - you'll make sure that you can hit your SLA's this way as well as getting used to it and ensuring the tapes have data on them. If you have 100GB stores, the solution that you have wouldn't be acceptable IMHO.
Tris -----Original Message----- From: Sinton, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 October 2001 16:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups Our backup media is 35/70GB DLT and HP Ultrium. At our current 60GB, full backups of our servers require over 15 hours; and we're planning substantial increases in array size at all sites. How are those of you who have storage in excess of 100GB assuring that you have reliable backups? Do you have the tapes running all the time? _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
