thanks for the information....

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olds, Dominic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 12 December 2001 11:55
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: firewall problem
> 
> 
> Any open port is a potential security risk. This risk 
> increases with the
> amount you "open up" on your firewall. Personally, I would 
> only ever allow
> SMTP traffic to an (relay protected) exchange box inside a firewall.
> Anything else and I would relay from a box sitting in the DMZ 
> (for smtp, OWA
> etc etc) thus meaning I only have to allow the RPC and stuff 
> for exchange
> between 2 specifically defined boxes from the DMZ to the 
> internal network.
> It will make your life easier if you open these ports right?? 
> So it follows
> that a hacker's life becomes easier too. If you choose the 
> lazy route you
> are likely to pay for it in other ways.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Dom.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 12 December 2001 11:46
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: firewall problem
> 
> 
> i'd like to open our exchange server through the firewall, but my boss
> thinks this is a 'massive security risk'. i think if i open it just to
> specified hosts, then that would be ok. what does anyone else think?
> 
> dan.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Watkins V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 12 December 2001 11:16
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: firewall problem
> > 
> > 
> > Dear all,
> > 
> > I have several exchange servers which work fine through a 
> > firewall except
> > one, using the TechNet recommended ports for DS and IS of 
> > 1300 and 1301
> > respectively.  The one that doesn't work is one which is 
> > running Win2K.  The
> > others run NT4.  I have set the ports to 1300 and 1301 in the 
> > registry as
> > usual, but the server is ignoring this fact.  It is just 
> > using random ports
> > and so I am having to change the firewall ports instead!!!   
> > The ports it
> > uses change after every reboot, so obviously, this is troublesome.
> > Anyone have a fix for this?
> > We are using Exchange 5.5 sp4
> > 
> > thanks
> > Vanessa Watkins
> > Network Manager
> > Royal Holloway
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to