there is a KB about that i think, have a search....

> 
> Hi,
> Does anyone know about the original question which was why 
> exchange on Win2K
> changes its ports and how it can be stopped?
> many thanks
> Vanessa
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 12 December 2001 13:27
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: firewall problem
> 
> 
> What about monitoring of those servers in the DMZ?  Do you 
> use PerfMon to
> check queues or critical processes?  If so, what ports are 
> needed there if
> your monitoring workstation is on the other side of the DMZ?  
> Or do you
> simply use some kind of paging system when it reaches a threshold?
> 
> Nate Couch
> EDS Messaging
> 
> > ----------
> > From:       Atkinson, Daniel
> > Reply To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent:       Wednesday, December 12, 2001 06:42
> > To:         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject:    RE: firewall problem
> > 
> > 
> > thanks for the information....
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Olds, Dominic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: 12 December 2001 11:55
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: firewall problem
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Any open port is a potential security risk. This risk 
> > > increases with the
> > > amount you "open up" on your firewall. Personally, I would 
> > > only ever allow
> > > SMTP traffic to an (relay protected) exchange box inside 
> a firewall.
> > > Anything else and I would relay from a box sitting in the DMZ 
> > > (for smtp, OWA
> > > etc etc) thus meaning I only have to allow the RPC and stuff 
> > > for exchange
> > > between 2 specifically defined boxes from the DMZ to the 
> > > internal network.
> > > It will make your life easier if you open these ports right?? 
> > > So it follows
> > > that a hacker's life becomes easier too. If you choose the 
> > > lazy route you
> > > are likely to pay for it in other ways.
> > > 
> > > Regards
> > > 
> > > Dom.
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: 12 December 2001 11:46
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: firewall problem
> > > 
> > > 
> > > i'd like to open our exchange server through the 
> firewall, but my boss
> > > thinks this is a 'massive security risk'. i think if i 
> open it just to
> > > specified hosts, then that would be ok. what does anyone 
> else think?
> > > 
> > > dan.
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Watkins V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: 12 December 2001 11:16
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: firewall problem
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Dear all,
> > > > 
> > > > I have several exchange servers which work fine through a 
> > > > firewall except
> > > > one, using the TechNet recommended ports for DS and IS of 
> > > > 1300 and 1301
> > > > respectively.  The one that doesn't work is one which is 
> > > > running Win2K.  The
> > > > others run NT4.  I have set the ports to 1300 and 1301 in the 
> > > > registry as
> > > > usual, but the server is ignoring this fact.  It is just 
> > > > using random ports
> > > > and so I am having to change the firewall ports instead!!!   
> > > > The ports it
> > > > uses change after every reboot, so obviously, this is 
> troublesome.
> > > > Anyone have a fix for this?
> > > > We are using Exchange 5.5 sp4
> > > > 
> > > > thanks
> > > > Vanessa Watkins
> > > > Network Manager
> > > > Royal Holloway
> > > > 
> > > > 
> _________________________________________________________________
> > > > List posting FAQ:       
> http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > > Archives:               
> http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to