This is why Microsoft got hit so hard with the Nimda virus. If one is going
to allow dev machines to have contact with a production network, I think a
vulnerability scanner and automated system to isolate rogue machines would
be a must.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 10:15 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: AV! a full time job?
> 
> 
> Kumindra, I respectfully disagree.
> 
> Martin is correct on this one. The LAST thing you want is 
> people on the dev team moving boxes back and forth between a 
> dev network and a prod network. That is definitely a recipe 
> for disaster. In a large environment, the dev people rarely, 
> if ever, are responsible for supporting anything in the 
> production environment. You want one group that is 
> responsible for this type of work, and a change management 
> system that requires approvals before machines are put on the 
> prod network. Doing it any other way in a large environment 
> is an exercise in masochism. Even with a CM process in place, 
> you are bound to get screwed from time to time, but it does 
> minimize the occurrences. 
> 
> I can't even imagine the nightmare you would have if there 
> were three test networks and everyone had free reign to move 
> boxes from those test networks to the prod network. You might 
> as well say you have four test networks. You would rarely 
> have a clue what broke or who did it. The only thing you 
> could be sure of in the environment you describe is 
> everything being screwed up and anyone with a brain shopping 
> their resume.
> 
> My $.02
> 
> Tom.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kuminda Chandimith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 5:05 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: AV! a full time job?
> 
> I disagree with this, Specially y if you have a Development team.
> 
> We used to have a separate Development domain, (infact 2 or 3 
> of them) We may be setting up and removing domain servers in 
> regular basis, for various R&D and Development related work. 
> 
> What one Can do is to physically move those computers out of 
> the main network, But then people might have communication 
> problems. I don't have much Of experience in how to manage 
> such installations, but We some how managed with a little bit 
> of extra discipline from the "Developers side". 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Kuminda Chandimith
> Sr. Technical Consultant
> Ducont.com FZ-LLC
> Tel:  + 971-4-3913000 Ext 237
> Fax: +971-4-3913001
> http://www.ducont.com
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 27 December 2001 21:11
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: AV! a full time job?
> 
> 
> So it really isn't a matter of too much work, but rather a 
> matter of poor management. In any company, but in particular 
> one your size, allowing departments to manage computers is a 
> recipe for disaster. It probably seemed like a good idea at 
> the time, but not any longer. There should be a central point 
> of contact for all machines. Orders are placed through that 
> group and delivered to them for configuration and delivery to 
> the end users or departments. That way all hardware is fully 
> tracked and managed. You should be using logon scripts as one 
> method of pushing out AV installs and DAT updates. That way 
> for someone to login, AV software has to be installed.
> 
> I would suggest rather than spend 50-60K a year for an AV 
> tech, that you put that time / money into better management. 
> Ill bet you if you went to upper management and said "OK, we 
> need a new hardware procedure, OR we need to spend 60K a year 
> for an AV guy, they would let you have your way"
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:04 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: AV! a full time job?
> 
> 
> Symantec Corporate, 7.5.  Waiting for 7.6 to arrive.  We also 
> will be purchasing a Mcafee e500.
> 
> A good portion of or problems relate to a LAZY supervisor and 
> several departments that are in charge of their own 
> equipment.  Just yesterday we ran into a lab that had 15 new 
> machines on our domain that we didn't know about.  All 
> without any AV and 2 were nimda monsters.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:03 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: AV! a full time job?
> 
> What are you using for your AV solution?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:00 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: AV! a full time job?
> 
> 
> At 1300 machines given the problems we appear to be having, 
> the guy that does our AV wants a FTE created for it because 
> he feels it would be appropriate.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:01 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: AV! a full time job?
> 
> How big is your company?
> 
> Is 10,000 users enough for it to be a full time job?  100,000 users?
> 
> It varies from org to org.
> 
> -- Drew
> ********************************
> Visit http://www.drewncapris.net!  Go!  Go there now!
> Violence ends by defeating itself. It creates bitterness in 
> the survivors and brutality in the destroyers. --Dr. Martin 
> Luther King, Jr.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Ko
> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:57 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: AV! a full time job?
> 
> 
> I don't think this is a full time job.   If you have a full time
> position just for A/V, you'd have to have a backup person 
> since viruses
> do not take any vacation.   Instead of having full time position, pay
> A/V vendor to notify you (& other support staffs) when 
> there's new virus via pager, cell phone, email, etc.  If you 
> want to have closer relationship with A/V vendor, pay more 
> money to have someone like Technical Account Manager, TAM.  
> Once you have those communcation method established, you have 
> to have software that can distribute updates automatically and fast.
> 
> My two cents...
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric
> Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 4:24 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: AV! a full time job?
> 
> 
> 
> Just curious what some of the Exchange Admins think.  Would 
> you consider Antivirus a full time job?  I speak for both 
> email and network/desktop.
> 
> 
> Around here it isn't, although we wish it was cause it seems 
> to be getting neglected.  We are around 1300 users right now.
> 
> e-
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to