What are you saving that 99% processor and 20% RAM for, exactly?

-- Drew
********************************
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net!  Go!  Go there now!
"Preserving our freedom is one of the main reasons that we are now engaged in
this new war on terrorism. We will lose that war without firing a shot if we
sacrifice the liberties of the American people." -Senator Russ Feingold (D-WI),
10/25/01 opposing the enactment of the USA-PATRIOT Act

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization


Excuse me for doubting but I can only base my assumptions on real world
experience.  I know for a fact that a typical Exchange Box with Mailboxes
providing Mapi based services with a 4 gig priv will run around 800 meg ram
utilization.  With two processors and a raid controller  on this box your
would drastically reduce the disk i/o activity on this box which equates to
cooler drives and a longer lasting exchange box.  Maybe it's overkill but
I'd much rather have an Exchange Box running at 1% processor utilization and
have 20% of my physical ram free.

Thanks.
Brian Murphy, MCSE, CCNA, CCA
Director of Network Services
Privacy Officer
Carter Bloodcare (www.carterbloodcare.org)
817.412.5406


-----Original Message-----
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization


Do you doubt the Word of the Dogg???

A spanking!  A spanking!!!

-- Drew
********************************
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net!  Go!  Go there now!
His enemies are not demons, but human beings like himself.  He doesn't wish
them
personal harm.  Nor does he rejoice in victory.  How could he rejoice in
victory
and delight in the slaughter of men? (Lao Tzu, Tao Te Ching)

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization


No you don't.

-----Original Message-----
From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization


I have 4000 users running off of less then a Gig or ram. And almost a
gig Page file. How many users you planning maintaining?

Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization


400 Mailboxes and 1 gig of Ram does not sound right.  Your primary
problem is hardware.

This is my minimum recommendation for your hardware requirements.

Dual Pentium III 550 +
Separate Raid Controller running in Raid 5 config.  (2 partitions
logical) 2 Gig physical memory. 3 Gig Page File on second partition Run
optimizer and move the databases and log files to 2nd partition.


-----Original Message-----
From: Frazer J Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: High Physical Memory Utilization


One of my colleagues recently reinstalled a 5.5 SP4 Exchange Server on
NT4 SP5 (only Exchange was reinstalled) and have noticed that the
Physical Memory Utilization sits at around 99% (prior to the rebuild it
was around 60%).  The server has about 400 mailboxes on it and has 1Gb
of physical memory and 1Gb page file.  It is the same spec as 4 other
servers in the site which all sit at around 60% utilization.  As it is a
24x7 service we offer on our server, down time is very limited.  Is
there any way I can check the performance optimizer settings without
stopping the store? Or are there any other pointers that anyone can
think of I can check?



_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_________________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to