The design goal is to have a native e2k site (remove dependencies from, and turn off the e5.5 server).
I can't do this at the moment without affecting the outbound mail transfer of 1 e2k server. Does that answer your question? MP -----Original Message----- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 31 January 2002 12:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: X.400 problem... What's the design goal here? -----Original Message----- From: Mark Peoples To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 1/30/2002 6:16 PM Subject: X.400 problem... Hi, I have an e2k server that routes internet-bound messages to the x400 connector and then to my E5.5 server for tranmission. When I disable the MTA and IMC on the e5.5 server, instead of messages travelling via SMTP to another e2k server in the site (with an IMS), the messages sit in the x400 queue (on the e2k server) waiting for the MTA on the e5.5 server to be started. All servers are in the same outing and administrative groups. Inbound e-mail travels the correct route (e2k->e2k). I have tried disabling the Exchange services on the e5.5 server and restarting the MTA and routing services on the offending e2k server.... to no avail. Any ideas on how to 'convince' the offending e2k server to natively talk to the other e2k server first? Thanks, MP _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
