It may solve the problem... but I am just anticipating the consequences if removing the server form the organization doesn't work...?
Will I have mail sitting on the e2k server in the x400 connector that will have nowhere to go or will e2k figure out that there is the whole SMTP thing happening...? I was thinking about upgrading the e5.5 server to e2k server and then removing the IMC from the upgraded server - would that be a safer option...?? If that works, then I could just remove the upgraded server from the org when all is OK... On the other hand, if that doesn't work... I guess a call to PSS is in order.... Or is that giving myself too much work (worry) for nothing? Your feedback is appreciated! Thanks, MP -----Original Message----- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 31 January 2002 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: X.400 problem... What makes you think that actually removing the server from the organization won't meet the desired objective? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 7:12 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: X.400 problem... > > > The design goal is to have a native e2k site (remove > dependencies from, and turn off the e5.5 server). > > I can't do this at the moment without affecting the outbound > mail transfer of 1 e2k server. > > Does that answer your question? > MP > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, 31 January 2002 12:08 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: X.400 problem... > > > What's the design goal here? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Peoples > To: Exchange Discussions > Sent: 1/30/2002 6:16 PM > Subject: X.400 problem... > > Hi, > > I have an e2k server that routes internet-bound messages to > the x400 connector and then to my E5.5 server for > tranmission. When I disable the MTA and IMC on the e5.5 > server, instead of messages travelling via SMTP to another > e2k server in the site (with an IMS), the messages sit in the > x400 queue (on the e2k server) waiting for the MTA on the > e5.5 server to be started. > > All servers are in the same outing and administrative groups. > Inbound e-mail travels the correct route (e2k->e2k). > > I have tried disabling the Exchange services on the e5.5 > server and restarting the MTA and routing services on the > offending e2k server.... to no avail. > > Any ideas on how to 'convince' the offending e2k server to > natively talk to the other e2k server first? > > Thanks, > MP > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
