Their reasoning is to save disk space (there really is not a disk space issue...9 GB store on a 40 GB drive for example)...and to speed up backups.
-----Original Message----- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 10:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: eseutil /d One cannot prove a negative. Have them give their reasoning for this and then you can address their concerns. ----- Original Message ----- From: "paragon400" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 11:32 AM Subject: eseutil /d > I have some team members here that believe that regular > defragmentation > (offline) should be done as routine maintenance. I don't share this > opinion, but I am having a hard time finding evidence to support my > belief. Does anyone know of any links that support the theory that > eseutil should not be used for regular maintenance or am I wrong and > should it be part of regular maintenance? > > Exchange 5.5 environment. > > Thanks for any help anyone can provide. > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]