I apologize for leading anyone astray, but Siegfried I was absolutely stunned to hear you say it wasn't so. I have been following this for a long time and I though it was a done deal.
Please give me your comments on the following links. http://www.dnjonline.com/TechEd2001/reports/sess_keynote_jon.html http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/20879.html I am checking with a few of my SQL contacts who work for Microsoft to hear what they can officially say about this. I know a few who work on part of the teams who are involved in the SQL.NET File System which you may or may not know if very similar to WSS, and is optimized for handling the sort of non-rectangular record sets that Exchange has. --Felicity > Neither will ESE98 being ported to SQL Server nor does the next version > of Exchange have an SQL Server based database engine. > > As I mentioned already. Please check that information with the source > you got it from and stop posting plain wrong information here which > might confuse other people. > > <Siegfried /> > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:21 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging) > >=20 > > I know that, I was making a dumb joke about the fact that SQL Server > will > > be providing the next database engine for the next version of > Exchange. > > And the code name for the next version of SQL Server is Yukon. > >=20 > > Can you confirm that ESE98 is being ported to SQL Server? > >=20 > > TIA > >=20 > > --Felicity > > > The next version of Exchange is not codenamed Yukon. > > > > > > William > > > ____________________________________________________ > > > *Titanium* Racing Bikes > > > "Why ride when you can fly?" - William Lefkovics > > > www.airborne.net > > > ____________________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity > Smith > > > Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:05 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging) > > > > > > > > > Unified Messaging is faceing pressures from two opposite directions. > > > One from Americans with Disabilities Act which requires greater > richness > > > - ie text to voice, braille, etc, and at the opposite pole - greater > > > thinness - ie minimalism for text based phones - which strip away > all > > > conten but text, and then compress words for instance - removing > vowels, > > > TLA's etc. > > > > > > MIS will now be included with the next version of Exchange (code > name > > > Yukon). > > > > > > --Felicity > > > > > > > That'd be worth reading. I'm _still_ nicking odd quotes from you > when > > > > > > > I need to compare messaging to dial-tone availability :) > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 00:13 > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging) > > > > > > > > > > > > Catch me in the right mood and maybe I will do a data dump for you > . . > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 21:33 > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging) > > > > > > > > > > > > Iam looking for information on: > > > > 1. Messaging & Collaboration > > > > 2. Unified Messaging > > > > > > > > The type of information I am looking for is on: > > > > 1. Why it is happening (who it is for) > > > > 2. Who is making it happening (vendors) > > > > 3. How is it happening (solutions) > > > > > > > > Looking for Articles? Consortiums? > > > > > > > > Note: I've got Technet, so I already have the Microsoft view on > this > > > > topic. > > > > > > > > Thanks in advanced, > > > > Leonard > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >=20 > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
