I am still waiting to hear from some other guys on the SQL Dev team.  But
I suspect that there is some gag order.

Happy to help you Ed!

--Felicity
> Gee, thanks for the insight!  That certainly clears evrything up!
> 
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
> Tech Consultant
> hp Services
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:22 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
> 
> 
> I just heard back from one of my contacts at Microsoft.  He said that he
> can't comment on it.  But he did say that there are some wild theories
> out there.  "Some are crazy and some are more sane"
> 
> --Felicity
> > Sadly enough, true. Conclusion: unless it is a released product there
> > is nothing you can really rely on, even a press announcement.
> > 
> > <Sig />
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:38 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging) =20
> > > At ATE 2 years ago, we spent a lot of time answering questions about
> > the
> > > amazing E2K WebDav features in Outlook 2002 based on the 
> > >presentations  given  there eh Sig? I don't exactly trust things I 
> > >read on  http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/default.asp as gospel 
> > >either. =20
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:25 AM
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > From the http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/20879.html:
> > > >
> > > > <quote>
> > > > The pending announcement is vitally important for Microsoft, 
> > > > because the rumors suggest that Kodiak, the next major release of
> > > > Exchange Server, will use Yukon as its store rather than the 
> > > > current JET/EDB/ESE storage engine. If that is the case, then 
> > > > Yukon will need to handle the extraordinary storage flexibility 
> > > > that Exchange Server offers today. </quote>
> > > >
> > > > Read it closely. It doesn't say the next version of Exchange. It 
> > > > talks a about a future MAJOR release code named Kodiak. Also note
> > > > that both articles is from 07/08/2001, about a year old! I 
> > > > wouldn't count on anything which isn't officially from Microsoft 
> > > > and current.
> > > >
> > > > And of course, these are all rumors unless it is officially 
> > > > confirmed in public by Microsoft. So, unless I read it on 
> > > > http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/default.asp I do not believe it
> 
> > > > is true.
> > > >
> > > > Can we now get back to our daily work and stop feeding the rumor
> > mill?
> > > >
> > > > <Siegfried />
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:17 PM
> > > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > > Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
> > > > >
> > > > > I apologize for leading anyone astray, but Siegfried I was
> > > > absolutely
> > > > > stunned to hear you say it wasn't so.  I have been
> > > > following this for
> > > > a
> > > > > long time and I though it was a done deal.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please give me your comments on the following links.
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.dnjonline.com/TechEd2001/reports/sess_keynote_jon.htm
> > > > > l
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/20879.html
> > > > >
> > > > > I am checking with a few of my SQL contacts who work for
> > > > Microsoft to
> > > > hear
> > > > > what they can officially say about this.  I know a few who work
> > > > > on
> > > > part of
> > > > > the teams who are involved in the SQL.NET File System which
> > > > you may or
> > > > may
> > > > > not know if very similar to WSS, and is optimized for handling 
> > > > > the
> > > > sort of
> > > > > non-rectangular record sets that Exchange has.
> > > > >
> > > > > --Felicity
> > > > > > Neither will ESE98 being ported to SQL Server nor does the 
> > > > > > next
> > > > version
> > > > > > of Exchange have an SQL Server based database engine.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As I mentioned already. Please check that information with the
> > > > source
> > > > > > you got it from and stop posting plain wrong information
> > > > here which
> > > > > > might confuse other people.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > <Siegfried />
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:21 PM
> > > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > > > > Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging) =
> > =3D20
> > > > > > > I know that, I was making a dumb joke about the fact that 
> > > > > > > SQL
> > > > Server
> > > > > > will
> > > > > > > be providing the next database engine for the next version 
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > Exchange.
> > > > > > > And the code name for the next version of SQL Server is
> > > > Yukon. =3D20
> > > > > > > Can you confirm that ESE98 is being ported to SQL Server? 
> > > > > > >=3D20  TIA
> > > > > > >=3D20
> > > > > > > --Felicity
> > > > > > > > The next version of Exchange is not codenamed Yukon.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > William 
> > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________
> > > > > > > > *Titanium* Racing Bikes
> > > > > > > > "Why ride when you can fly?" - William Lefkovics
> > > > > > > > www.airborne.net
> > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> > > > Felicity
> > > > > > Smith
> > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:05 PM
> > > > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > > > > > Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Unified Messaging is faceing pressures from two opposite
> > > > directions.
> > > > > > > > One from Americans with Disabilities Act which
> > > > requires greater
> > > > > > richness
> > > > > > > > - ie text to voice, braille, etc, and at the opposite pole
> 
> > > > > > > > -
> > > > greater
> > > > > > > > thinness - ie minimalism for text based phones - which 
> > > > > > > > strip
> > > > away
> > > > > > all
> > > > > > > > conten but text, and then compress words for instance
> > > > - removing
> > > > > > vowels,
> > > > > > > > TLA's etc.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > MIS will now be included with the next version of
> > > > Exchange (code
> > > > > > name
> > > > > > > > Yukon).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --Felicity
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > That'd be worth reading.  I'm _still_ nicking odd
> > > > quotes from
> > > > you
> > > > > > when
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I need to compare messaging to dial-tone availability :)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > > From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 00:13
> > > > > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > > > > > > Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified 
> > > > > > > > > Messaging)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Catch me in the right mood and maybe I will do a
> > > > data dump for
> > > > you
> > > > > > . .
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > > From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 21:33
> > > > > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > > > > > > Subject: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Iam looking for information on:
> > > > > > > > > 1. Messaging & Collaboration
> > > > > > > > > 2. Unified Messaging
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The type of information I am looking for is on: 1. Why 
> > > > > > > > > it is happening (who it is for) 2. Who is making it 
> > > > > > > > > happening (vendors) 3. How is it happening (solutions)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Looking for Articles?  Consortiums?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Note: I've got Technet, so I already have the Microsoft
> > view
> > > > on
> > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > topic.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks in advanced,
> > > > > > > > > Leonard
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > List posting FAQ:
> > > > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > > > > > > > Archives:
> > > > http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe:
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > List posting FAQ:
> > > > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > > > > > > > Archives:
> > > > http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe:
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > > > > > > List posting FAQ:
> > > > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > > > > > > Archives:
> > > > http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > > > > > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > >=3D20
> > > > > > >
> > > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > > > > > List posting FAQ:
> > > > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > > > > > Archives:
> > > >            http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> _________________________________________________________________
> > > > > List posting FAQ:
> http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > > > Archives:
> http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > >=20  
> > >_________________________________________________________________
> > > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to