If one is configured there, yes. Still works fine without a mailbox configured there. :o)
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 4:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Not entirely true. At least in Ex5.5, If you don't associate postmaster@ with a specific mailbox, it sends all postmaster@ to the administrators mailbox set in the IMC ------------------------------------------------------ Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -----Original Message----- > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:william@;techsanctuary.org] > Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 3:33 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Postmaster reply address > > > The SMTP address exists as the from address for outbound NDRs. > > You still have to configure an inbound mailbox to receive > [EMAIL PROTECTED] email. > > You server will still run fine without doing that. > > I bet...it can be captured, a little sink d'event and eau de > toillette, > and we can change the From: address to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] :o) > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Daniel > Chenault > Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 11:12 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Postmaster reply address > > > Except that the address is hard-coded into Exchange. ;) > > -----Original Message----- > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:william@;techsanctuary.org] > Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 10:23 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Postmaster reply address > > > Based on RFC. > > Your server will run just fine without it. ;o) > > William > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Daniel > Chenault > Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 8:20 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Postmaster reply address > > > postmaster@ is required > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tom Meunier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 5:15 PM > Subject: RE: Postmaster reply address > > > No. root@, postmaster@, hostmaster@, abuse@, etc. are just "strongly > suggested" iirc. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:DNicholson@;rapidapp.com] > > Posted At: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 11:05 AM > > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > > Conversation: Postmaster reply address > > Subject: RE: Postmaster reply address > > > > > > I don't know if you _can_ change it, but you shouldn't. > > Isn't there an RFC that says a system has to have to have > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]? > > > > Anyway, just configure your profile (or another one) to look > > at that mailbox. > > > > Drew Nicholson > > Technical Writer > > Network Engineer > > LAN Manager > > RapidApp > > 312-372-7188 (work) > > 312-543-0008 (cell) > > Born To Edit > > > > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
