That doesn't prove it to me. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird SMTP header problem No. 1. People who's mailboxes are still on MSX 5.5 servers do not see the problem. 2. A reboot of the E2K mailbox server clears the problem up (at least for a while). -----Original Message----- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird SMTP header problem I suspect this is a feature of one of your hosts outside Exchange. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 7:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Weird SMTP header problem Our E2K mailbox servers have recently developed a bad habit... Many people here (myself included) create Outlook rules to move their Internet email into a separate folder based on the SMTP headers. A couple of days ago this stopped working. An quick examination of an incoming Internet email's headers showed that most all of the header information was gone, and what was there is strange. Our email flow is this: 1. Internet to Cleanmail (floyd.cinergycom.net) (for virus scrubbing) 2. Cleanmail to our checkpoint firewall (kimbintinc-cp.kimball.com) 3. Checkpoint to nts126 (a NT4/MSX5.5 IMS connector) 4. nts126 to nts390 (E2K mailbox) via MTA Normally, Internet email "Received:" headers look like this (edited for brevity): Received: from kimbintinc-cp.kimball.com (igate.kimball.com [167.178.249.18]) by nts126.kimball.com ... Received: (6577 bytes) by floyd.cinergycom.net Received: by cleanmail.com ... Received: from csc222.csc.dg.com(xn82.emc.com[168.159.1.82]) (6103 bytes) by floyd.cinergycom.net Notice that nts390 is NOT listed in the headers, since nts126 (an MSX5.5 IMS server) sends email to nts390 (E2K mailbox server) via MTA, not SMTP. However, recently, This is what I see when looking at headers: Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 Received: by nts390.kii.kimball.com id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 09:03:08 -0500 There are several things wrong with this picture: 1. All of the preceding (timewise) "Received:" headers are gone. 2. Internet mail cannot be going directly to nts390, it must be going through nts126 3. The one "Received:" header does not show who the message was received from. A reboot of the E2K mailbox server fixes the problem for a while, then it mysteriously comes back. Any ideas? _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]