mmmmmmmmm thong backs

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
        Sent: Fri 07/02/2003 15:40 
        To: Exchange Discussions 
        Cc: 
        Subject: Re: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
        
        

        Its a thong with MSFT on the back.
        
        
        ----- Original Message -----
        From: "Robert Moir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 10:30 AM
        Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
        
        
        > Me too. Sounds like we've all been missing out.
        >
        > -----Original Message-----
        > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
        > Sent: Fri 07/02/2003 15:24
        > To: Exchange Discussions
        > Cc:
        > Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
        >
        >
        >
        > I'm very interested to know what secret compensation he is speaking of.
        > Deckler, care to elaborate?
        >
        > -----Original Message-----
        > From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
        > Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 7:22 AM
        > To: Exchange Discussions
        > Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
        >
        >
        > Yeah. You should see the developers run whenever Chris starts walking
        > towards them.
        >
        > Andy, you forgot to tell me about that "direct compensation" you get for
        > being an MVP. Unless he's talking about that t-shirt?
        >
        > -----Original Message-----
        > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
        > Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 9:11 AM
        > To: Exchange Discussions
        > Subject: Re: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
        >
        >
        > lol
        > Thanks for the good laugh.
        > I have found that the harshest critics of Microsoft products are the MVPS
        > themselves.
        >
        > Andy David
        > Microsoft MVP.
        > There, is that better?
        >
        > ----- Original Message -----
        > From: "Greg Deckler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        > Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 9:05 AM
        > Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
        >
        >
        > > My point is that it serves no useful purpose to cast aspersions as to
        > > people's attitudes and motivations because everyone is biased in one
        > > way or another.
        > >
        > > I believe that this is really systemic with regards to the problems of
        > > the IT industry as a whole. The entire industry is vendor and tool
        > > focused and that is a huge problem in IT. It tends to polarize people
        > > such that everyone is grouped into two categories, people that hate a
        > > particular vendor or tool and people that love a particular vendor or
        > > tool. This is just plain stupid.
        > >
        > > The IT industry has some fundamental problems. Microsoft, as part of
        > > that industry suffers from some of the same problems as well as some
        > > of their own unique deficiencies. Novell has their own unique issues,
        > > so does IBM and so does every other vendor in this space. But it seems
        > > that you cannot point out these deficiencies without people
        > > categorizing and stereotyping you in one way or another. I reject
        > > that.
        > >
        > > I hate all vendors of software tools equally. I find this an absolute
        > > requirement to provide true, unbiased consulting services. If you were
        > > to follow my posts on a GroupWise board or a Notes board, you would
        > > see me make similar arguments regarding the deficiencies of their
        > > products and company. However, since I make most of my revenue from
        > > Microsoft products and Exchange, I tend to be more active in that
        > > area.
        > >
        > > And the other thing that REALLY chaps me is people that cast
        > > aspersions on others without fessing up to their own biases. MVP's are
        > > the worst of this lot. They secretly get direct compensation from
        > > Microsoft and then try to pass themselves off as unbiased. But you
        > > look at their posts and it is obvious that they are simply paid
        > > advocates for Microsoft and part of their responsibility is to vilify
        > > anyone that says anything negative with regards to Microsoft. And
        > > these are the same people that list every last certification and other
        > > acronym that they can paste onto the end of their sig, but you never
        > > see Microsoft MVP. I wonder why? Microsoft asked me to become an MVP
        > > and I told them to go jump in a lake. More people need to take this
        > > approach and be true consultants, not advocates.
        > >
        > > > Are you saying that your own interpretation of your own attitude is
        > > > unbiased? Or that your own evaluation of whether or not your
        > > > paranioa about how Microsoft are out to get you is unbiased?
        > > >
        > > > Rob
        > > > Also an MVP by the way.
        > > > Want to throw some mud at me too?
        > > >
        > > > > -----Original Message-----
        > > > > From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20
        > > > > Sent: 07 February 2003 11:43
        > > > > To: Exchange Discussions
        > > > > Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
        > > > >=20
        > > > >=20
        > > > > And Ed, if I am not mistaken, you are also a Microsoft MVP,=20  so
        > > > >whose interpretation is unbiased, mine or yours? =20
        > > > > > I continue to believe my interpretation of your attitude is
        > > > > >more=20  accurate than your defense thereof. =20
        > > > > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
        > > > > > Tech Consultant
        > > > > > hp Services
        > > > > > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
        > > > > >=20
        > > > > >=20
        > >
        > > _________________________________________________________________
        > > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
        > > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
        > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        > >
        >
        >
        > _________________________________________________________________
        > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
        > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
        > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        >
        > _________________________________________________________________
        > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
        > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
        > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        >
        > _________________________________________________________________
        > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
        > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
        > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        >
        >
        > .+--xm ,) r(뺷 \ bí¹¨í¶½!  0 & zÇšȱr櫬:.Ë› m隊[hy \z[, )r䉄 
ZZvh˧+-i٢2̞G(
        
        
        _________________________________________________________________
        List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
        Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
        To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        

.+-¦‹-Šxm¶ŸÿÃ,Â)Ür‰¿­ë(º·ýì\…öª†Ù€­Èb½ë!¶Úÿ0³
§‘Ê&þÈ­zÇš­È±æ«r¬¥:.žË›±Êâm隊[h•æ¯yì\…©àz[,Ã)är‰„ÅÈZž‹ŠËZvh§–+-iÙ¢žÌ2žG(


Reply via email to