Actually cache mode works fine with Exchange 5.5 (I'm using it that way home and office) and Exchange 2000. You just are restricted to Full Items sync when you do it that way. Exchange 2003 is required to support drizzle mode (Headers and then Full Items).
Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 13:38 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Sync Folders - Small Bandwith > > Being a home and road office worker with DSL, I've really > come to love Outlook 11 and Exchange 2003, both of which, by > the way, are required to make the cache mode ("Use local copy") work. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 11:30 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Sync Folders - Small Bandwith > > > If the user is working offline consistently and synchronizing > periodically, I don't see why you'd have an issue. I've set > up large numbers of users to work this way in the past. While > Outlook 11 does offer some enhancements, working offline with > an OST is a pretty common scenario. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Posted At: Monday, June 09, 2003 9:34 AM Posted To: swynk > Conversation: Sync Folders - Small Bandwith > Subject: RE: Sync Folders - Small Bandwith > > > Im guessing then that the main disadvantage with current > Offline Folder is > the fact that when emails come in you are working from the > Mailbox, so you > open a large email and its not held in your Offline Folders until you > synchronise, that means downloading the email again. > > Also, what would happen if emails got deleted off the server > and people > synchronise? The synchronise folders will delete the missing > emails from > themselves? > > > > So as it stands, Offline Folders are not really a viable > solution for small > bandwidth sites as they leave you working from the mailboxes. > By sounds of > things, the best use for Offline Folders would be a 15 minute synch > interval, but once you have a synch of an email are you > working from the > synch folder or from the Mailbox when you read them and you > are Online? > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=& > lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
