If you wanted to get all convoluted and all you could make hidden
mailboxes that forward to the pfs.  Its a lot of work and it would not
be pretty..but I bet it would work.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wendel, Jesse
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco
Uni fied Messaging


Cisco won't authenticate to a PF.  It requires a mailbox.

-----Original Message-----
From: Presley, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco
Uni fied Messaging


Why not store the voice mail messages in public folders (each person
gets their own of course) that live on a dedicated pf store for vm and
set a different type of backup schedule for that pf store?  You could
also set up the folders so that they delete any messages in the folders
that are over say 2 weeks (or whatever is required).   

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger
Seielstad
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco
Uni fied Messaging


Hmmm.. You've got some interesting lawyers then...

Anyway, why not script something like ExMerge or the Mailbox Cleanup
agent
to delete all VM's older than XX days?

I'd also suggest getting a clarification of "longer than needed" from
the
attorneys. That's vague, even from a lawyer!

--------------------------------------------------------------
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 12:36 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail 
> from Cisco Unified Messaging
> 
> 
> Roger and others,
> 
> We're the largest utility in the Pacific Northwest.  We have 
> a high legal profile.
> 
> Per our attorneys, we are not to back up voice messages 
> longer than needed for disaster recovery.
> 
> If I put them in a second store, I can back that store up 
> just enough (say, 1-2 weeks) for disaster recovery, but not 
> long term, like the years we are required by FERC to keep 
> tapes of our email.
> 
> What we want to avoid is having to go through or hand over 
> voice mail during legal discovery process.  Which we'd have 
> to do if they were backed up as part of the regular email 
> store.  But if they're off in their own store, we just don't 
> back up that store (or keep tapes for very long), and there 
> isn't a problem.
> 
> The problem with doing this, as I said below - is that 
> Cisco's UM doesn't support secondary authentication, so I do 
> what I'd originally planned, which is, make a secondary 
> mailbox for voice and just have people attach to it; it has 
> to be the primary account people are logged in as, or we lose 
> some UM functionality.
> 
> And I really don't want to write some kludged up event sink 
> based on message class to check if its a voice mail or not, 
> and if not, to rewrite the From line and move the sent 
> message over to the non-voice mail Exchange mailbox.
> 
> So I'm hoping someone has another idea.  Because I'm stuck.
> 
> Jesse Wendel
> Sr. Technical Systems Analyst
> Primary Messaging/DNS Administrator
> www.pse.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 5:12 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco
> Uni fied Messaging
> 
> 
> Yeah. Back it up as part of the store. What's the big deal? 
> Its going to be
> backed up anyway, and going to take the same amount of time 
> and space. Why
> are you making it needlessly complex?
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
> Sr. Systems Administrator
> Inovis Inc.
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 5:25 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from 
> > Cisco Unified Messaging
> > 
> > 
> > I'm trying to figure out how to back up Exchange Servers 
> > WITHOUT backing up voice mails placed into Exchange by 
> > Cisco's Unified Messaging (UM).
> > 
> > I had thought of routing messaging from the UM to a separate 
> > store - creating a secondary mailbox for each user - say, 
> > John User (juser) and John User - Voice (juser-v) - and grant 
> > permissions to juser to access juser-v.  Unfortunately, UM is 
> > junk software and doesn't support secondary authentication.  
> > It requires one to be logged in with the juser-v account.
> > 
> > And if I log everyone in as juser-v and let their secondary 
> > be juser, then every time they send mail, it isn't in the 
> > proper sent items mail box, and it isn't coming from the 
> > appropriate address.  And obviously people aren't going to 
> > use the FROM box and manually move items from the one Sent 
> > Items folder to the other.
> > 
> > I'm now reduced to speculating about writing code using the 
> > event sink, based on the class used by UM, to set where mail 
> > goes, and who it is from, but grrr, what a kludge.
> > 
> > So I don't know what to do.
> > 
> > Any ideas?
> > 
> > Jesse Wendel
> > Sr. Technical Systems Analyst
> > Primary Messaging/DNS Administrator
> > www.pse.com
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Web Interface: 
> > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
> ext_mode=&lang=english
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface: 
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
ext_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to