Would it be better than one stripe set of 7 RAID1 couples? 

-----Original Message-----
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 2:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 'Requesting Data' again...

Well the process would be to rebuild the current seven disk RAID 5 array
into a 7 disk stripe set with a second 7 disk stripe set as the mirror.
We're looking at doing other things as well, like breaking up the three
MDB's into additional, smaller MDB's.  



John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Coleman,
Hunter Posted At: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 10:55 AM Posted To:
Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: 'Requesting Data' again...
Subject: RE: 'Requesting Data' again...


Are you seeing disk queue counters higher than they should be on your
RAID5 set? If not, then rebuilding it as RAID10 likely won't buy you
anything. 

-----Original Message-----
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 11:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 'Requesting Data' again...

The last time I looked at a tuning guide (Jim McBee's Exchange book)
your RPC request counter should not go above 25. 

I've been fighting this battle as well. I've been thinking about
reconfiguring the drives from RAID 5 to RAID 1+0 to increase performance
that way. 

Anyone have any comments?


John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John
Strongosky Posted At: Friday, November 21, 2003 4:52 PM Posted To:
Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: 'Requesting Data' again...
Subject: RE: 'Requesting Data' again...


correct, but what would the benchmark be?

-----Original Message-----
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 1:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 'Requesting Data' again...


But it doesn't say to not use RPC requests as a monitoring tool :)

-----Original Message-----
From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 4:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 'Requesting Data' again...

thanks ben...got the doc and filed it away in my AD migration folder, I
have an old exchange book put out by microsoft press (notes from the
field), that I looked at after I read your email but it has nothing
about rpc requests to be used as a monitoring tool...

john

-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 1:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 'Requesting Data' again...


The doc I posted is specific to troubleshooting Exchange 2000, but you
should find many of the same counters available.  I'll see if I can dig
up one for Exchange 5.5. 


Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner & White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418


-----Original Message-----
From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At:
Friday, November 21, 2003 4:23 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: 'Requesting Data' again...
Subject: RE: 'Requesting Data' again...


Thanks Ben, understand what is your problem may not be my problem but
its a start, should have stated that we are running ex 5.5 nt 4.0 and
having the same problem. The box exchange runs on is dual proc p2 400
with 1 gb of memory with about 360 users plus its a PF server and has
IMC.. This is good to know now because we are in the process of planning
for our win2k/exchange deployment...

john

-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 10:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 'Requesting Data' again...


Added more memory :-)

Go through the counters though.  What was my problem may not be your
problem.  Our server supports roughly 180 mailboxes, dual P2 2.0Ghz
Xeon, was 1gb ram, W2K standard, E2K Ent.  We added another 512mb of
memory and it has been happy ever since.  But like I said, that was us.
Your problem may be something else entirely.  That is why I urge you to
go through that document.  It will help you determine exactly where the
problem is.  The other thing that you have to be careful of is you don't
really want to get above 1.5gb or at a max 2gb of memory in standard
(running exchange, at least).  You'll start to get 9582 virtual memory
errors.


Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner & White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418


-----Original Message-----
From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At:
Friday, November 21, 2003 12:43 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: 'Requesting Data' again...
Subject: RE: 'Requesting Data' again...


Ben, since you found out your server was not handling the RPC
connections fast enough, what did you do to correct this?


thanks

john
-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 10:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 'Requesting Data' again...


Do some more digging.  This link goes through how to identify if the
problems is the client, or server.  When we used to get those messages
here, there were no events being logged on the server, but it wasn't
handling RPC requests fast enough.  Anyways, this will help you.  Be
sure to go through all the steps so that you can figure out where the
problem is.
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/prodt
echn
ol/exchange/exchange2000/support/TROUPERF.asp
echnol/exchange/exchange2000/support/TROUPERF.asp 


Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner & White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418


-----Original Message-----
From: Simon Bond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday,
November 20, 2003 11:42 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: 'Requesting Data' again...
Subject: 'Requesting Data' again...


Mail Server :Exchange 5.5 SP4, Server OS Win2K SP4.

Client OS WinXP, Office XP SP2

We are about to start a major XP rollout at work to approximately 3000
users and the pilots have all been going well apart from a nagging
problem with Outlook and the 'requesting data' message. The server
cards, ports and general I/O have been extensively tested on the servers
and there are no dodgy eventlog messages. We are also running the latest
Trend antivirus solutions on the servers with McAffee 7.0 on the WinXP
client machines.
I'm convinced the problem doesn't lie with the servers (but still open
to suggestion).In fact all apparently seems to be well apart from the
fact Outlook hangs all the time. Can anyone who has experienced this
give me any pointers as to how they fixed the issue? It's driving me mad
and could well delay the rollout.

All help greatly appreciated, thanx

Simon

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]




_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to