It would be incorrectly simplified either way. Part of the process would be to utilise a more secure OS (by default) than ANY flavour/version/twist of Linux. For me, that would fall on the only OS I know to maintain the mandate of secure by default, OpenBSD.
I certainly wouldn't want to keep a production Exchange server behind a Windows-based 'firewall' product. -----Original Message----- From: Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 5:42 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exch5.5 and Linux firewall On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Lefkovics, William wrote: >> your Linux Firewall > > or if you'd prefer, a firewall on a secure OS. "Security is a process, not a product." -- Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
