If your words are not worthy of your own name, how can you expect them to be worthy of anyone's time?
8k? That's a pretty small user... William -----Original Message----- From: dp To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: 11/4/01 6:08 PM Subject: RE: Eseutil Nicknames are Sparky, Speed Bump, others too 1.9gig mailboxs are cool with OST files Old threads...sorry if it was a couple days late...Been doing a 8k user domain migration... -----Original Message----- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2001 20:59 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Eseutil What is wrong with a 1.9GB mailbox? Why are you rehashing old threads? Do you have a name, or shall we assign you one? William -----Original Message----- From: dp To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: 11/3/01 9:21 PM Subject: RE: Eseutil Hot fixes, make sure no one is running a 1.9 gig Mailbox -----Original Message----- From: Scott Schnoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:05 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Eseutil MessageIMHO, this statement is wrong: "The best maintance [sic] for Exchange is apply service packs. other then that nothing needs to be done." There is a lot more to maintaining Exchange than applying service packs. You should also regularly review your event logs (daily, if not more frequently). There are some good tools out there that can automate this for you. You should also regularly collect and monitor performance data. You also need to watch mail queues for build-up, verify that your Exchange-aware antivirus software is working and keeping up-to-date, monitor disk space, and perform a whole other slew of tasks that combine to form your Exchange maintenance practices. Don't think for a minute that applying service packs is all you need to do to keep your servers up longer. There are lots of other factors that affect uptime and availability and they should not be overlooked. My $.02. -Scott List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
