That was my Guess : >

Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE


-----Original Message-----
From: dp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2001 6:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Eseutil


David precht hailing from just west of beantown 

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2001 21:22
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Eseutil


He is getting at who are you? DP can mean many things. We like to have
names.

We already have a sparky, speed bump does not sounds good. 

Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE


-----Original Message-----
From: dp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2001 6:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Eseutil


8000 users domain migration 
What ya trying to get at?

-----Original Message-----
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2001 21:07
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Eseutil


If your words are not worthy of your own name, how can you expect them
to be worthy of anyone's time?

8k?  That's a pretty small user...

William


-----Original Message-----
From: dp
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: 11/4/01 6:08 PM
Subject: RE: Eseutil

Nicknames are Sparky, Speed Bump, others too
1.9gig mailboxs are cool with OST files
Old threads...sorry if it was a couple days late...Been doing a 8k user
domain migration...

-----Original Message-----
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2001 20:59
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Eseutil


What is wrong with a 1.9GB mailbox?  Why are you rehashing old threads?

Do you have a name, or shall we assign you one?

William



-----Original Message-----
From: dp
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: 11/3/01 9:21 PM
Subject: RE: Eseutil

Hot fixes, make sure no one is running a 1.9 gig Mailbox

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Schnoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:05
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Eseutil


MessageIMHO, this statement is wrong:

"The best maintance [sic] for Exchange is apply service packs. other
then that nothing needs to be done."

There is a lot more to maintaining Exchange than applying service packs.
You should also regularly review your event logs (daily, if not more
frequently).  There are some good tools out there that can automate this
for you.  You should also regularly collect and monitor performance
data.  You also need to watch mail queues for build-up, verify that your
Exchange-aware antivirus software is working and keeping up-to-date,
monitor disk space, and perform a whole other slew of tasks that combine
to form your Exchange maintenance practices.

Don't think for a minute that applying service packs is all you need to
do to keep your servers up longer.  There are lots of other factors that
affect uptime and availability and they should not be overlooked.

My $.02.

-Scott



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



_________________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



_________________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Reply via email to